EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION

EJMSTE-19173-2022-R1

Peer assessment processes in a problem-solving activity with future teachers

ABSTRACT
Assessing problem solving remains a challenge for both teachers and researchers. With the aim of contributing to the understanding of this complex process, this paper presents an exploratory study of peer assessment in mathematical problem-solving activities. The research was conducted with a group of future Secondary mathematics teachers who first were asked to individually solve an open-ended problem and then, to assess a classmate’s answer in pairs. We present a study of two cases involving two pairs of students, each of whom assessed the solution of a third classmate. The analysis was carried out in two interrelated phases: (a) individual solutions to the mathematical problem and (b) the peer assessment process. The results show that, in both cases, the assessors were strongly attached to their own solutions, which directly influenced the assessment process, focused on aspects that involve the general problem-solving process and the results. The main difference between the evaluation processes followed by the two pairs lies in the concept of assessment. While the first pair focuses on assessing the resolution process and errors, the other focuses its discussion on giving a numerical grade.
KEYWORDS
evaluation, mathematics, peer assessment, problem solving, teacher training
FULL-TEXT (PDF)
YOUR DECISION
MINOR REVISION - You want to see again
YOUR COMMENTS TO AUTHORS

This article is interesting, but it needs an explanation in some parts. There needs to be an explanation of how to develop problem-solving test questions, and what mathematical material to focus on. did it go through the previous validation process? explain the process.
The problem-solving indicators in this research refer to whom? there needs to be confirmed.
Apart from tests, what techniques were used to collect data? documentation? deep interview? audio recording? need to be explained.
Regarding the categories used in the analysis (general processes, operations, reasoning, and results), defined from those shown by Arnal-Bailera, et al. (2018), this requires further explanation about each category, so that readers get a clearer picture, before implementing it in data analysis.
To make it easier for the reader to understand, it is necessary to make an analysis table of the differences in the results of the assessment of the two cases based on the Arnal Bailera category, so that it is easier to draw conclusions.

 

YOUR COMMENTS FOR EDITORIAL STAFF
(None)
Copyright © 2004 - 2026 EditorialPark. All rights reserved.